On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Lonni J Friedman <netllama@gmail.com> writes:
>> ... Now I've got the
>> opposite problem, namely that I can't find a way to have my function
>> not return anything at all. Whenever I try to remove the 'RETURN AS
>> ....' portion of the function, it fails to get created. Is it not
>> possible to have a function that returns nothing?
>
> Declare it as RETURNS VOID. This is really just window dressing, as
> the actual behavior is to return a null value, but it documents your
> intention.
thanks, that is exactly what I needed.
