On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 11:11 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
> More to the point, I'm not sure I like the creation of yet another DLL
> to deal with this. The reason this isn't just exported from the main
> backend is the same reason we created the libpqwalreceiver library I'm
> sure - bt that means we already have one.
>
> How about we just use this same source file, but compile and link it
> directly into both dblink and libpqwalreceiver? That'd leave us with
> one DLL less, making life easier.
ISTM that we cannot compile dblink using USE_PGXS=1, if that DLL doesn't
exist in the installation directory. No?
> As for the code itself, don't we need a CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS in there
> for it to be actually useful?
Yes. I'll add a CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS in the loop.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
