Tom Lane wrote:
>Thomas Hallgren <thhal@mailblocks.com> writes:
>
>
>>Would such a patch be accepted?
>>
>>
>
>Seems like a brute-force solution. I'd look first at whether
>AtCommit_Portals could just restart its hashtable scan after
>each deletion; if that seems too inefficient, modify the hash
>table entries themselves to carry a "portal already deleted"
>flag.
>
>
Yes, a static flag indicating that a deletion has occured will work fine
since all portals that has not been perused but not dropped now has an
InvalidSubTransactionId. I'll do it that way then.
Regards,
Thomas Hallgren
