Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Historic snapshot doesn't track txns committed in BUILDING_SNAPSHOT state - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From cca5507
Subject Re: Historic snapshot doesn't track txns committed in BUILDING_SNAPSHOT state
Date
Msg-id tencent_87C84CE1211C38DB8D8646159ED5EEA6640A@qq.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Historic snapshot doesn't track txns committed in BUILDING_SNAPSHOT state  (Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view
Hi,

- IIUC your "fast forward" concern is not related to this particular thread but you
- think it's already an issue on the master branch (outside of the BUILDING_SNAPSHOT
- handling we are discussing here), is that correct? (that's also what your coding
- changes makes me think of). If so, I'd suggest to open a dedicated thread for that
- particular "fast forward" point and do the coding in the current thread as if the
- fast forward is not an issue.

- Does that make sense?

Yes.

But I think the v4-0001 in [1] is fine.

Let's see what others think.

--
Regards,
ChangAo Chen

[1]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/tencent_925A991463194F3C97830C3BB7D0A2C2BD07%40qq.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ajay Pal
Date:
Subject: Re: SQL Property Graph Queries (SQL/PGQ)
Next
From: Dean Rasheed
Date:
Subject: Re: Optimize mul_var() for var1ndigits >= 8