Request a Demo
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Inline non-SQL SRFs using SupportRequestSimplify - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From zengman
Subject Re: Inline non-SQL SRFs using SupportRequestSimplify
Date
Msg-id tencent_3EF6CE184AC6A8910C540D6F@qq.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Inline non-SQL SRFs using SupportRequestSimplify  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Inline non-SQL SRFs using SupportRequestSimplify
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Hi everyone,

I've noticed this interesting feature and would like to modify this test case to clarify that we fall back to the
originallogic when inlining fails. 
 
This is a small change that doesn't touch core code. What do you all think?

Regards
Man Zeng
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Xuneng Zhou
Date:
Subject: Re: RFC: adding pytest as a supported test framework
Next
From: Hironobu SUZUKI
Date:
Subject: [PATCH] Reduce EXPLAIN ANALYZE overhead for row counting