"=?ISO-8859-1?B?emVuZ21hbg==?=" <zengman@halodbtech.com> writes:
> I've noticed this interesting feature and would like to modify this test case to clarify that we fall back to the
originallogic when inlining fails.
> This is a small change that doesn't touch core code. What do you all think?
I think this looks like a waste of test cycles. AFAICS it won't add
even a single line of code coverage for inline_function_in_from().
Why do you think we need it?
regards, tom lane
