Re: NOT HAVING clause? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Andrew - Supernews
Subject Re: NOT HAVING clause?
Date
Msg-id slrndtdggk.d6t.andrew+nonews@atlantis.supernews.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to NOT HAVING clause?  (Alban Hertroys <alban@magproductions.nl>)
Responses Re: NOT HAVING clause?  (Alban Hertroys <alban@magproductions.nl>)
List pgsql-general
On 2006-01-24, Will Glynn <wglynn@freedomhealthcare.org> wrote:
> You might try:
>
> SELECT some_column
>   FROM some_table
>   GROUP BY some_column
>   HAVING SUM(CASE WHEN sort_order=1 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) = 0;

SELECT some_column
  FROM some_table
 GROUP BY some_column
HAVING every(sort_order <> 1);

every() is in 8.1 at least (can't recall when it was introduced); it's the
same as bool_and(), i.e. an aggregate that returns true only if all inputs
are true. Why isn't there a corresponding any(), I wonder? (bool_or does
exist)

It should be possible to define bool_and() or every() in the usual way as
a custom aggregate even on versions that don't have them builtin.

--
Andrew, Supernews
http://www.supernews.com - individual and corporate NNTP services

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "gianni.zammarchi@tiscali.it"
Date:
Subject: pgxml
Next
From: "Foster, Stephen"
Date:
Subject: Setting expire date on insert/modify