Re: BitmapHeapScan streaming read user and prelim refactoring - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: BitmapHeapScan streaming read user and prelim refactoring
Date
Msg-id qr2bjfd7sxrnear442kc3fkdghgmojaex6nq7kdoh67oybrjca@mpnbn2b55zi2
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BitmapHeapScan streaming read user and prelim refactoring  (Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: BitmapHeapScan streaming read user and prelim refactoring
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2025-03-17 14:52:02 -0400, Melanie Plageman wrote:
> I don't feel strongly that we need to be as rigorous for
> maintenance_io_concurrency, but I'm also not sure 160 seems reasonable
> (which would be the same ratio as before).

I'd lean towards just setting them to the same value for now.

Greetings,

Andres Freund



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Matheus Alcantara
Date:
Subject: Re: dblink: Add SCRAM pass-through authentication
Next
From: Álvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_stat_statements and "IN" conditions