Re: BitmapHeapScan streaming read user and prelim refactoring - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Melanie Plageman
Subject Re: BitmapHeapScan streaming read user and prelim refactoring
Date
Msg-id CAAKRu_b7i-XScoA843jhk5WmCzpFtgmip0rz2vXqB+nuUpxctA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BitmapHeapScan streaming read user and prelim refactoring  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: BitmapHeapScan streaming read user and prelim refactoring
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 2:55 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>
> On 2025-03-17 14:52:02 -0400, Melanie Plageman wrote:
> > I don't feel strongly that we need to be as rigorous for
> > maintenance_io_concurrency, but I'm also not sure 160 seems reasonable
> > (which would be the same ratio as before).
>
> I'd lean towards just setting them to the same value for now.

Cool, here's the patch I intend to commit. I had a bit of trouble
clearly explaining the situation in the commit message which is why I
didn't directly commit it. If no one  has ideas on how to clarify it
by tomorrow, I'll just push it.

- Melanie

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Christoph Berg
Date:
Subject: Re: support fix query_id for temp table
Next
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: pg_upgrade: Preserve default char signedness value from old clus