Re: go for a script! / ex: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Harald Fuchs
Subject Re: go for a script! / ex: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL
Date
Msg-id pupth43wgd.fsf@srv.protecting.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to go for a script! / ex: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL  ("Nick Barr" <nicky@chuckie.co.uk>)
Responses Re: go for a script! / ex: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL
List pgsql-performance
In article <1065837333.12875.1.camel@jester>,
Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca> writes:

>> Would anyone object to a patch that exports the blocksize via a
>> readonly GUC?  Too many tunables are page dependant, which is
>> infuriating when copying configs from DB to DB.  I wish pgsql had some
>> notion of percentages for values that end with a '%'.

> Rather than showing the block size, how about we change the tunables to
> be physical sizes rather than block based?

>         effective_cache_size = 1.5GB
>         shared_buffers = 25MB

Amen!  Being forced to set config values in some obscure units rather
than bytes is an ugly braindamage which should be easy to fix.

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Date:
Subject: Re: sql performance and cache
Next
From: Richard Huxton
Date:
Subject: Re: [SQL] sql performance and cache