Hi,
I did see the message about the change of the function signatures to
include IMMUTABLE and thought "Yes, that makes sense" - however, it has
now occurred to me that:
1. xpath_table uses a SELECT query to fetch the data it uses, so should
presumably be marked STABLE?
2. xslt_process is to be considered IMMUTABLE if the stylesheet or
document are literal values, but if either is a URL then they are fetched
on evaluation. An optimisation down to one call of xslt_process (using the
URL contents current at that point) almost certainly conforms with "least
surprise" for most use cases, but it's not strictly true as a second call
could return a different result - comments?
It may be that neither of these has a significant practical impact for
most users, but I thought it might be worth flagging, now that I've been
working on contrib/xml2 again[*]
Regards
John
[*] I've written an XML output function that composes the XML document
structure based on the SQL join hierarchy; I'll post something on hackers
for comments in the near future. This may or may not have been rendered
redundant by the SQL/XML work recently added!
