Re: partitioning max() sql not using index - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Kenneth Cox
Subject Re: partitioning max() sql not using index
Date
Msg-id op.uzzs03uj5ru9c3@kent60.home
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: partitioning max() sql not using index  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: partitioning max() sql not using index  (Kevin Kempter <kevink@consistentstate.com>)
List pgsql-performance
In case you aren't comfortable running unreleased planner patches from
pgsql-hackers, a workaround was discussed on this list recently:

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2009-09/msg00036.php

On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 06:05:22 -0400, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote:

> Kevin Kempter wrote:
>> Hi all I have a large table (>2billion rows) that's partitioned by date
>> based
>> on an epoch int value.  We're running a select max(id) where id is the
>> PK. I
>> have a PK index on each of the partitions, no indexes at all on the base
>> table.
>>
>> If I hit a partition table directly I get an index scan as expected:
>
> The planner isn't smart enough to create the plan you're expecting.
> There was discussion and even a patch posted recently about that:
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-07/msg01115.php
>
> It seems the thread petered out, but the concept seems sane.
>



--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Reydan Cankur
Date:
Subject: Best Profiler for PostgreSQL
Next
From: Kevin Kempter
Date:
Subject: Re: partitioning max() sql not using index