Re: T is a mandatory date time separator in RFC3339 but documentation states differently - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From Erik Wienhold
Subject Re: T is a mandatory date time separator in RFC3339 but documentation states differently
Date
Msg-id n5j5tsqbh55orr36bhpibcd7k3ckztsu75q4uhmmncbpedu4ok@vib6inzin3el
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: T is a mandatory date time separator in RFC3339 but documentation states differently  (Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>)
Responses Re: T is a mandatory date time separator in RFC3339 but documentation states differently
List pgsql-docs
On 2023-11-15 08:16 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> The SQL standard does not refer to ISO 8601 to define date formats, it has
> its own definitions.  In fact, PostgreSQL implements more date formats than
> the SQL standard requires.

Really?  Then what does the standard mean with section "Definitions
taken from ISO 8601" which I quoted in [1]?  Just using the term "date"
without adopting its syntax?

And the Postgres docs also say "The SQL standard requires the use of the
ISO 8601 format." [2]

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/piavtdd7mhmkpzpgvxaek3hz3e2kan3c2fitn5iqta6nyrpgyl%40txongxshxkxw
[2] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/datatype-datetime.html#DATATYPE-DATETIME-OUTPUT

-- 
Erik



pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: T is a mandatory date time separator in RFC3339 but documentation states differently
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: T is a mandatory date time separator in RFC3339 but documentation states differently