Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: T is a mandatory date time separator in RFC3339 but documentation states differently - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: T is a mandatory date time separator in RFC3339 but documentation states differently
Date
Msg-id 408aa3cd-0085-41c3-855c-3d51a1bc55d3@eisentraut.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: T is a mandatory date time separator in RFC3339 but documentation states differently  (Erik Wienhold <ewie@ewie.name>)
Responses Re: T is a mandatory date time separator in RFC3339 but documentation states differently
List pgsql-docs
Tree view 
On 14.11.23 19:21, Erik Wienhold wrote:
> I did not say that occurrences of "ISO 8601" should be replaced with
> "RFC 3339".  Just that the docs should have a cautionary note about the
> SQL standard using a subset of ISO 8601 and that Postgres does not
> implement (at the moment) all of its date formats.

The SQL standard does not refer to ISO 8601 to define date formats, it 
has its own definitions.  In fact, PostgreSQL implements more date 
formats than the SQL standard requires.

pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: Erik Wienhold
Date:
Subject: Re: T is a mandatory date time separator in RFC3339 but documentation states differently
Next
From: Erik Wienhold
Date:
Subject: Re: T is a mandatory date time separator in RFC3339 but documentation states differently