Re: Rewriting pg_upgrade - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Doug McNaught
Subject Re: Rewriting pg_upgrade
Date
Msg-id m3smmfkw21.fsf@varsoon.wireboard.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Rewriting pg_upgrade (was Re: State of Beta 2)  ("Jim C. Nasby" <jim@nasby.net>)
List pgsql-general
Christopher Browne <cbbrowne@libertyrms.info> writes:

> pgman@candle.pha.pa.us (Bruce Momjian) writes:
> > Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> >> FWIW, FreeBSD just removed it (in the 5.x versions). Of course you can
> >> still easily install it from ports.
> >
> > Interesting.  Why would they remove it?
>
> Because it's a REALLY BIG ball of mud to include as a core dependancy?

/agree

Also, it's quite probable that people installing/upgrading PG would
have anything from 5.003 onward.  Knowing what programming constructs
you can use and still be compatible with older versions requires quite
a bit of scholarship.

I know that if I were upgrading PG on, say, a Red Hat 6.2 box and was
forced to upgrade Perl to 5.8.1 as a dependency I'd be swearing pretty
hard...

-Doug

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Lamar Owen
Date:
Subject: Re: Where is libpq++ on redhat 9?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Is there any way to force analyze to run on a whole table?