Re: Testing 9.2 in ~production environment - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From James Cloos
Subject Re: Testing 9.2 in ~production environment
Date
Msg-id m3k3z533co.fsf@carbon.jhcloos.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Testing 9.2 in ~production environment  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: Testing 9.2 in ~production environment
List pgsql-hackers
>>>>> "PE" == Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:

PE> That depends on how you built it.  Just being a beta by itself doesn't
PE> turn on any extra debugging.

OK.  So either I misremembered or it was something no longer done.

PE> That depends on how you built it.

Its a Gentoo box; both were build from their ebuilds, with the same gcc,
flags, etc.

PE> Compare the output of pg_config --configure from both installations.

The only differences are 9.1 vs 9.2 in the paths.

Thanks,

-JimC
-- 
James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>         OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: James Cloos
Date:
Subject: Re: Testing 9.2 in ~production environment
Next
From: Steve Singer
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/16] Introduce the concept that wal has a 'origin' node