Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Why do features have OIDs? Is this for pg_depend entries? If so, would
> it work to have pg_depend entries point to extensions instead?
Yes, for pg_depend, no I don't know how to make that work with pointing
to the extensions directly, because the whole point here is to be able
to depend on a feature rather than the whole extension.
Use cases:
- depend on a feature f that appeared in version y of the extension (bugfix, new capability)
- deprecate a feature: alter extension update removes a feature, you want to know that the dependent extensions need
processing(cascade to remove them in the operation, or update them before hand, etc) (still manual operation though)
I don't see how to handle those cases with a direct dependency on the
extension rather than one of its features.
Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
