Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> writes:
> I was worried about that too at first, but Fujii pointed out that's OK: see
> last paragraph at
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2012-08/msg01203.php.
Mmm, ok.
I'm worried about master-standby-standby setup where the master
disappear, we promote a standby and the second standby now feeds from
the newly promoted standby. Well we have to reconnect manually in this
case, but don't we need some similar stopgaps?
Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
