On 05.09.2012 07:55, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas<hlinnaka@iki.fi> writes:
>> I was worried about that too at first, but Fujii pointed out that's OK: see
>> last paragraph at
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2012-08/msg01203.php.
>
> Mmm, ok.
>
> I'm worried about master-standby-standby setup where the master
> disappear, we promote a standby and the second standby now feeds from
> the newly promoted standby. Well we have to reconnect manually in this
> case, but don't we need some similar stopgaps?
The second standby will have to reconnect, but it will happen automatically.
- Heikki
