Re: transforms - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dimitri Fontaine
Subject Re: transforms
Date
Msg-id m2li9rnsty.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: transforms  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: transforms
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> At run time, this will sort itself out, because all the required modules
> will be loaded.  The problem is when you create the "glue" extension and
> haven't invoked any code from any of the dependent extension in the
> session.  Abstractly, the possible solutions are either not to check the
> functions when the extension is created (possibly settable by a flag) or
> to somehow force a load of all dependent extensions when the new
> extension is created.  (I say extension here even though dynamically
> loadable modules are attached to functions, which makes this even more
> confusing.)

I think CREATE EXTENSION should be LOADing all distinct modules
referenced from all required extensions functions. It does sound easy
enough to code, and I can't imagine why we would want to not do that.

Regards,
-- 
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr     PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Gavin Flower
Date:
Subject: Re: Duplicate JSON Object Keys
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Enabling Checksums