Re: DeArchiver process - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dimitri Fontaine
Subject Re: DeArchiver process
Date
Msg-id m2ipn0uov9.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: DeArchiver process  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: DeArchiver process
List pgsql-hackers
Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> writes:
> If we introduce "walrestore" process, pg_standby seems no longer useful.

pg_standby is one possible restore_command, right?  I had understood
that walrestore would be the process that cares for running that
command, not another implementation of it.

That said, I would really like us to provide a default restore command,
so if you had any intend of handling the restoring command in the
walrestore process, by all means, go ahead :)

Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr     PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: a tsearch issue
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: DeArchiver process