Re: Extensions, this time with a patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dimitri Fontaine
Subject Re: Extensions, this time with a patch
Date
Msg-id m27hhc4jfn.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Extensions, this time with a patch  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
> That is simply a horrid idea.  Just make it specify EXTENSION.

And VERSION too, finally.

So any extension 

>
>> and guessing
>> the CONTROL file name from the EXTENSION name only occurs when CONTROL
>> has not been provided.
>
> Here, on the other hand, I'm wondering why have two variables at all.
> Is there any sane use-case for the control file to not be named the same
> as the extension?  It seems like that would accomplish little except to
> sow confusion.
>
>             regards, tom lane

-- 
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr     PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Marti Raudsepp
Date:
Subject: psql: Don't close stdin, don't leak file descriptor with ON_ERROR_STOP
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Review: Fix snapshot taking inconsistencies