Re: Re: [GENERAL] Revised Copyright: is this more palatable?? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
Subject Re: Re: [GENERAL] Revised Copyright: is this more palatable??
Date
Msg-id m139nsX-000AXmC@druid.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: [GENERAL] Revised Copyright: is this more palatable??  (JanWieck@t-online.de (Jan Wieck))
List pgsql-hackers
Thus spake Jan Wieck
>     Right.  Someone  who  doesn't want to make his code "FREE" in
>     the entire meaning of this word but want to make it open  for
>     any  non-commercial  use  should  choose  it.  IMHO  the  GPL

While I am a proponent of keeping the BSD style license, there is nothing
in the GPL about using code for commercial use one way or the other.

--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@{druid|vex}.net>   |  Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/                |  and a sheep voting on
+1 416 425 1212     (DoD#0082)    (eNTP)   |  what's for dinner.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: The Hermit Hacker
Date:
Subject: Re: Article on MySQL vs. Postgres
Next
From: The Hermit Hacker
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [GENERAL] Revised Copyright: is this morepalatable?