Re: [HACKERS] New version number 6.6 or 7.0 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

>
> Can I have votes on what people want the next version number to be?
>
> We have to brand the release when we start development(PG_VERSION file).
> 6.5 probably should have been called 7.0, but we had already committed
> to 6.5.

Now seriously:

    Naming it 7.0 IMHO requires transaction log, tuple split over
    blocks, foreign keys, outer  joins  and  rules  of  arbitrary
    size. I don't expect ALL of them for the next release, so let
    it be 6.6.


Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
#========================================= wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) #