Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
>
> Going toward >8k tuples would be really good, but I suspect we may
> some difficulties with LO stuffs once we implement it. Also it seems
> that it's not worth to adapt LOs with newly designed tuples. I think
> the design of current LOs are so broken that we need to redesign them.
>
> [... LO stuff deleted ...]
I wasn't talking about a new datatype that can exceed the
tuple limit. The general tuple split I want will also handle
it if a row with 40 text attributes of each 1K gets stored.
That's something different.
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#========================================= wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) #
