Re: AW: [HACKERS] Solution to the pg_user passwd problem !?? (c) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
Subject Re: AW: [HACKERS] Solution to the pg_user passwd problem !?? (c)
Date
Msg-id m0y5buk-000BFRC@orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: AW: [HACKERS] Solution to the pg_user passwd problem !?? (c)  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: AW: [HACKERS] Solution to the pg_user passwd problem !?? (c)  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
>
> >
> > On Thu, 19 Feb 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > > >     Just curious, but why don't the copy command fall under the same
> > > > grant/revoke restrictions in the first place?  It sounds to me like we are
> > > > backing off of the problem instead of addressing it...
> > >
> > > grant/revoke works for copy.
> >
> >     Ah, okay, so when we have it setup so that a view overrides the
> > 'grant' of a select, then we're fine?
>
> Yep, but can we do that in nine days, and be sure it is tested?

    Don't think so - not really hard tested.

>
> --
> Bruce Momjian
> maillist@candle.pha.pa.us
>


Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
#======================================== jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) #

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: The Hermit Hacker
Date:
Subject: Re: AW: [HACKERS] Solution to the pg_user passwd problem !?? (c)
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: AW: [HACKERS] Solution to the pg_user passwd problem !?? (c)