>
> On Thu, 19 Feb 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > >
> > > On Thu, 19 Feb 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >
> > > > > Just curious, but why don't the copy command fall under the same
> > > > > grant/revoke restrictions in the first place? It sounds to me like we are
> > > > > backing off of the problem instead of addressing it...
> > > >
> > > > grant/revoke works for copy.
> > >
> > > Ah, okay, so when we have it setup so that a view overrides the
> > > 'grant' of a select, then we're fine?
> >
> > Yep, but can we do that in nine days, and be sure it is tested?
>
> I don't think so...but I'rather have the obviuos "select * from
> pg_user" closed off, and the more obscure "copy pg_user to stdout" still
> there then have both wide open...its a half measure, but its better then
> no measure...
But it is not secure. Why have passwords then?
--
Bruce Momjian
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us
