I'll answer with the same things I did on the Oracle list :)
> code
> description
>
> To avoid to have a so great number of similar tables in the db
> I wonder if it is a good idea to unify all these tables in one big table
> like this:
>
> id
> code
> table_ name
> description
>
> The advantages are:
>
> 1. only one table in the db instead of 100
That's not an advantage.
> 2. only one controller to manage the table
Why? You can also have a single controller with many tables.
With a single table the controller needs to know the code. With multiple tables the controller needs to know the table
name.
I don't see any difference there.
> Is there any negative point that I don't see?
Yes, you can't prevent storing the "wrong" code in a related table as you cannot have a foreign key to it.
Assume you have a list of codes for "order status" and a list of codes for employee status. With two lookup tables (and
theproper foreign keys) you can make sure that only a valid employee status is stored in the employee table.
With the single table you can't prevent storing a value for "order status" as the employee table.
Your design is an anti-pattern which has a name: "one true lookup table".
Thomas
