Re: DELETE using an outer join - Mailing list pgsql-sql

From Thomas Kellerer
Subject Re: DELETE using an outer join
Date
Msg-id jub46t$fl1$1@dough.gmane.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: DELETE using an outer join  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-sql
Tom Lane, 19.07.2012 16:52:
> If you're using a reasonably recent version of PG, replacing the NOT IN
> by a NOT EXISTS test should also help.

Thanks. I wasn't aware of that (and the NOT EXISTS does indeed produce the same plan as the OUTER JOIN solution)


>> Now I was wondering if a DELETE statement could be rewritten with the same "strategy":
>
> Not at the moment.  There have been discussions of allowing the same
> table name to be respecified in USING, but there are complications.

Thanks as well. It's not a big deal for me. I was just curious if I missed something.

Regards
Thomas





pgsql-sql by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: DELETE using an outer join
Next
From: Sergey Konoplev
Date:
Subject: Re: DELETE using an outer join