Re: MAX_BACKENDS size (comment accuracy) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: MAX_BACKENDS size (comment accuracy)
Date
Msg-id hvceozs7jbnycurw33cblufkhony3unoaigewew22vjvyta4mc@syjwlplmp566
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: MAX_BACKENDS size (comment accuracy)  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: MAX_BACKENDS size (comment accuracy)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2025-02-24 13:52:51 -0600, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> The recent commits for this drew my attention to the comment for
> MAX_BACKENDS.  Specifically, it says we check the value in
> RegisterBackgroundWorker() (which appears to have been untrue since we
> added max_worker_processes) and relevant GUC check hooks (which I removed
> last year in commit 0b1fe14).  I wrote a short patch to fix this, which I
> intend to commit soon unless there is feedback.

Makes sense.

Greetings,

Andres Freund



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Statistics Import and Export
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Statistics Import and Export