Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: MAX_BACKENDS size (comment accuracy) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nathan Bossart
Subject Re: MAX_BACKENDS size (comment accuracy)
Date
Msg-id Z7zOEzz8lNjaU9yf@nathan
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: MAX_BACKENDS size (comment accuracy)  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: MAX_BACKENDS size (comment accuracy)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
The recent commits for this drew my attention to the comment for
MAX_BACKENDS.  Specifically, it says we check the value in
RegisterBackgroundWorker() (which appears to have been untrue since we
added max_worker_processes) and relevant GUC check hooks (which I removed
last year in commit 0b1fe14).  I wrote a short patch to fix this, which I
intend to commit soon unless there is feedback.

-- 
nathan
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Daniel Verite"
Date:
Subject: pgbench client-side performance issue on large scripts
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Statistics Import and Export