Thank you, pushed
Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 11:36 PM, Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru> wrote:
>>> And the renaming of pg_clog to pg_xact is also my fault. Attached is
>>> an updated patch.
>>
>>
>> Thank you. One more question: what about symlinks? If DBA moves, for
>> example, pg_xact to another dist and leaves the symlink in data directoty.
>> Suppose, fsync on symlink will do nothing actually.
>
> I did not think of this case, but is that really common? There is even
> no option to configure that at command level. And surely we cannot
> support any fancy scenario that people figure out using PGDATA.
> Existing callers of fsync_fname don't bother about this case as well
> by the way, take the calls related to pg_logical and pg_repslot.
>
> If something should be done in this area, that would be surely in
> fsync_fname directly to centralize all the calls, and I would think of
> that as a separate patch, and a separate discussion.
>
--
Teodor Sigaev E-mail: teodor@sigaev.ru
WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/
