Re: backup manifests - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fujii Masao
Subject Re: backup manifests
Date
Msg-id ff4710f7-2331-4f6b-012e-d76da3275e91@oss.nttdata.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: backup manifests  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>)
Responses Re: backup manifests  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

On 2020/04/15 11:18, Fujii Masao wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2020/04/14 0:15, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 10:09 PM Fujii Masao
>> <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> wrote:
>>> I found other minor issues.
>>
>> I think these are all correct fixes. Thanks for the post-commit
>> review, and sorry for this mistakes.
> 
> Thanks for the review, Michael and Robert. Pushed the patches!

I found three minor issues in pg_verifybackup.

+        {"print-parse-wal", no_argument, NULL, 'p'},

This is unused option, so this line should be removed.

+    printf(_("  -m, --manifest=PATH         use specified path for manifest\n"));

Typo: --manifest should be --manifest-path

pg_verifybackup accepts --quiet option, but its usage() doesn't
print any message for --quiet option.

Attached is the patch that fixes those issues.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: design for parallel backup
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Concurrency bug in amcheck