Re: very large tables - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Laurent Wandrebeck
Subject Re: very large tables
Date
Msg-id fc593b510905250232x29cccddbr624a9aa18297a22b@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: very large tables  (Matthew Brand <mtthwbrnd@googlemail.com>)
List pgsql-general
Hello,

I'd try to use postgis ( http://postgis.refractions.net ), that allows
you to geolocalize your data. We use such an extention here for the
same kind of data you use. It will lighten up table size, and queries.
Otherwise, partitioning and cluster are good things to do. I would
increase default_statistics_target too. Up to 400, maybe ?
I don't know how/what for you analyse data, here we've clustered on time.

HTH.
Laurent

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Matthew Brand
Date:
Subject: Re: very large tables
Next
From: Alban Hertroys
Date:
Subject: Re: Query