Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files
Date
Msg-id fb6ad8cf-9788-40e2-abc5-42689e448dcf@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2025-07-29 Tu 11:40 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>> OK. I'm inclined to do this after the CF finishes, to avoid collisions
>> with other patches. I assume it's going to make the CFbot fairly unhappy.
> +1 for proceeding that way.  (I did not look at whether the proposed
> changes are sane, but I agree that this'll inevitably break a lot of
> pending patches.)
>
>             


Done.


cheers


andrew


--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Vik Fearing
Date:
Subject: Re: implement CAST(expr AS type FORMAT 'template')
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: GB18030-2022 Support in PostgreSQL