Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Florents Tselai
Subject Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files
Date
Msg-id CA+v5N40gEq7CJHxUWo1Znbc9PjKWLv=bTjnr3Z8TvnWrdX8Zug@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files
List pgsql-hackers


On 4 Aug 2025, at 4:09 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:


On 2025-07-29 Tu 11:40 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
OK. I'm inclined to do this after the CF finishes, to avoid collisions
with other patches. I assume it's going to make the CFbot fairly unhappy.
+1 for proceeding that way.  (I did not look at whether the proposed
changes are sane, but I agree that this'll inevitably break a lot of
pending patches.)




Done.


I discovered that when changing for func/func-aggregate.sgml, the HTML wasn’t marked for update.

IIUC the doc/Makefile should be updated as attached, right ?

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bertrand Drouvot
Date:
Subject: Re: Improve LWLock tranche name visibility across backends
Next
From: David Geier
Date:
Subject: Re: Reduce timing overhead of EXPLAIN ANALYZE using rdtsc?