Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files
Date
Msg-id 999003.1753803611@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> OK. I'm inclined to do this after the CF finishes, to avoid collisions 
> with other patches. I assume it's going to make the CFbot fairly unhappy.

+1 for proceeding that way.  (I did not look at whether the proposed
changes are sane, but I agree that this'll inevitably break a lot of
pending patches.)

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files
Next
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: Doc update proposal for the note on log_statement in the runtime config for logging page