Re: Proposal of new PostgreSQL Extension - PGSpiderExt - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Taiga KATAYAMA
Subject Re: Proposal of new PostgreSQL Extension - PGSpiderExt
Date
Msg-id fb4c71e7-ec00-243e-2a70-1b5af51519f6@toshiba.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Proposal of new PostgreSQL Extension - PGSpiderExt  (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>)
List pgsql-hackers
Thank you for your comment.

Please let me know if anyone has any other comments.

Regards,
Taiga Katayama

On 2020/09/10 21:09, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> On 10 Sep 2020, at 07:54, Taiga KATAYAMA <taiga.katayama@toshiba.co.jp> wrote:
> 
>> We hope to be incorporated this extension into PostgreSQL as one of
>> contrib module, and would like to try to propose to Commit Fest.
>> Could you kindly advise me and share your opinion?
> 
> FWIW I would like to see fewer modules in contrib rather than gaining more, and
> (I can't stress this enough) that's not in any way a comment on the quality or
> the usefulness of the extension in question here.
> 
> The outside-of-core ecosystem for postgres extensions has been discussed in
> various threads lately, and improving that seems a more sustainable solution
> than bundling more.  That's no doubt a lot easier said than done, but I think
> it's extremely important for the community.
> 
> cheers ./daniel
> 



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dmitry Dolgov
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting
Next
From: "Tharakan, Robins"
Date:
Subject: RE: track_planning causing performance regression