Re: Proposal of new PostgreSQL Extension - PGSpiderExt - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Daniel Gustafsson
Subject Re: Proposal of new PostgreSQL Extension - PGSpiderExt
Date
Msg-id E91A8B08-1CA1-41B0-9886-D2FE1ECA25A7@yesql.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to Proposal of new PostgreSQL Extension - PGSpiderExt  (Taiga KATAYAMA <taiga.katayama@toshiba.co.jp>)
Responses Re: Proposal of new PostgreSQL Extension - PGSpiderExt  (Taiga KATAYAMA <taiga.katayama@toshiba.co.jp>)
Re: Proposal of new PostgreSQL Extension - PGSpiderExt  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
> On 10 Sep 2020, at 07:54, Taiga KATAYAMA <taiga.katayama@toshiba.co.jp> wrote:

> We hope to be incorporated this extension into PostgreSQL as one of
> contrib module, and would like to try to propose to Commit Fest.
> Could you kindly advise me and share your opinion?

FWIW I would like to see fewer modules in contrib rather than gaining more, and
(I can't stress this enough) that's not in any way a comment on the quality or
the usefulness of the extension in question here.

The outside-of-core ecosystem for postgres extensions has been discussed in
various threads lately, and improving that seems a more sustainable solution
than bundling more.  That's no doubt a lot easier said than done, but I think
it's extremely important for the community.

cheers ./daniel


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ranier Vilela
Date:
Subject: Re: Windows regress fails (latest HEAD)
Next
From: Kasahara Tatsuhito
Date:
Subject: Re: Get memory contexts of an arbitrary backend process