On Wed, 2024-06-26 at 07:38 -0700, David G. Johnston wrote:
> We have a few choices then:
> 1. Status quo + documentation backpatch
> 2. Change v18 narrowly + documentation backpatch
> 3. Backpatch narrowly (one infers the new behavior after reading the existing documentation)
> 4. Option 1, plus a new v18 owner-execution mode in lieu of the narrow change to fix the POLA violation
>
> I've been presenting option 4.
>
> Pondering further, I see now that having the owner-execution mode be the only way to avoid
> the POLA violation in deferred triggers isn't great since many triggers benefit from the
> implied security of being able to run in the invoker's execution context - especially if
> the trigger doesn't do anything that PUBLIC cannot already do.
>
> So, I'm on board with option 2 at this point.
Nice.
I think we can safely rule out option 3.
Even if it is a bug, it is not one that has bothered anybody so far that a backpatch
is indicated.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
