Re: transactional DDL - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Lukas Kahwe Smith
Subject Re: transactional DDL
Date
Msg-id f9u500$2253$1@news.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: transactional DDL  (Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>)
Responses Re: transactional DDL
List pgsql-advocacy
Greg Smith wrote:

> There is now is a discussion of the benefits of PostgreSQL's
> transactional DDL abilities on the otherwise deprecated page at

Somewhat related ALTER TABLE in MySQL is actually a copy+drop, which
obviously is quite costly and time consuming. This is why they can offer
the convenience of allowing you to decide where to place a column in an
existing table. This in turn is something that ActiveRecord
implementations love, because they default to using the column order in
their view presentation. Which means a lot of people perceive this as a
missing feature in PostgreSQL.

regards,
Lukas

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: "Jonah H. Harris"
Date:
Subject: Re: 12 Silver Bullets
Next
From: "Simon Riggs"
Date:
Subject: Re: 12 Silver Bullets