Re: Index usage when bitwise operator is used - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From W.Alphonse HAROUNY
Subject Re: Index usage when bitwise operator is used
Date
Msg-id f97d4e240709170740g57c2169kaf8808339399b8bf@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Index usage when bitwise operator is used  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-performance
Hi, 
 
A little clarification. Actually,  TBL1.CATEGORY and/or  TBL2.CATEGORY may hold a binary value having multiple binary(ies) '1'.
Each binary value column represent an business attribute.
If a binary value column is equal to '1', it means that the business attribute is True,
otherwise it is false.
I adopted this avoid defining a detail table to table TBL1. Idem to TBL2.
 
If  TBL1.CATEGORY |  TBL2.CATEGORY > 0
=> it means that we have at least one common business attribute that is TRUE for TBL1 and TBL2.
 
Regards
W.Alf


On 9/17/07, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov > writes:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at  2:49 AM, in message
> <1190015368.148293.56830@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com>, valgog
> < valgog@gmail.com> wrote:=20
>> Are you sure you understood what was the question?
>>
>> Is the TBL1.CATEGORY = TBL2.CATEGORY the same as TBL1.CATEGORY &
>> TBL2.CATEGORY > 0?

> Yes, given that he stipulated that one and only one bit would be set.

Really?  In that case, isn't this bit-field just a bad implementation of
an enum-style field?

                       regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
      subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
      message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: Index usage when bitwise operator is used
Next
From: Markus Schiltknecht
Date:
Subject: Re: DRBD and Postgres: how to improve the perfomance?