Don't overwrite scan key in systable_beginscan() - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Don't overwrite scan key in systable_beginscan()
Date
Msg-id f8c739d9-f48d-4187-b214-df3391ba41ab@eisentraut.org
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Don't overwrite scan key in systable_beginscan()
Re: Don't overwrite scan key in systable_beginscan()
List pgsql-hackers
When systable_beginscan() and systable_beginscan_ordered() choose an 
index scan, they remap the attribute numbers in the passed-in scan keys 
to the attribute numbers of the index, and then write those remapped 
attribute numbers back into the scan key passed by the caller.  This 
second part is surprising and gratuitous.  It means that a scan key 
cannot safely be used more than once (but it might sometimes work, 
depending on circumstances).  Also, there is no value in providing these 
remapped attribute numbers back to the caller, since they can't do 
anything with that.

I propose to fix that by making a copy of the scan keys passed by the 
caller and make the modifications there.

In order to prove to myself that there are no other cases where 
caller-provided scan keys are modified, I went through and 
const-qualified all the APIs.  This works out correctly.  Several levels 
down in the stack, the access methods make their own copy of the scan 
keys that they store in their scan descriptors, and they use those in 
non-const-clean ways, but that's ok, that's their business.  As far as 
the top-level callers are concerned, they can rely on their scan keys to 
be const after this.

I'm not proposing this second patch for committing at this time, since 
that would modify the public access method APIs in an incompatible way. 
I've made a proposal of a similar nature in [0].  At some point, it 
might be worth batching these and other changes together and make the 
change.  I might come back to that later.

[0]: 
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/14c31f4a-0347-0805-dce8-93a9072c05a5%40eisentraut.org

While researching how the scan keys get copied around, I noticed that 
the index access methods all use memmove() to make the above-mentioned 
copy into their own scan descriptor.  This is fine, but memmove() is 
usually only used when something special is going on that would prevent 
memcpy() from working, which is not the case there.  So to avoid the 
confusion for future readers, I changed those to memcpy().  I suspect 
that this code has been copied between the different index AM over time. 
  (The nbtree version of this code is literally unchanged since July 1996.)
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: [bug fix] prepared transaction might be lost when max_prepared_transactions is zero on the subscriber
Next
From: Bertrand Drouvot
Date:
Subject: Re: Restart pg_usleep when interrupted