On 2018/04/25 4:49, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 12:21 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 11:25 AM, Alvaro Herrera
>> <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
>>> Robert, I think this is your turf, per 3d956d9562aa. Are you looking
>>> into it?
>>
>> Thanks for the ping. I just had a look over the proposed patch and I
>> guess I don't like it very much. Temporarily modifying the range
>> table in place and then changing it back before we return seems ugly
>> and error-prone. I hope we can come up with a solution that doesn't
>> involve needing to do that.
>
> I have done some refactoring to avoid that. See attached.
+1 for getting rid of the PlannerInfo argument of the many functions in
that code. I have long wondered if we couldn't rid of it and especially
thought of it when reviewing this patch.
Thanks,
Amit
