Re: purple letters - Mailing list pgadmin-support

From Darren Duncan
Subject Re: purple letters
Date
Msg-id f879c107-b60a-23ae-ba99-f95c738c02a0@darrenduncan.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: purple letters  (Murtuza Zabuawala <murtuza.zabuawala@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgadmin-support
For my part, when I designed my programming language, I intentionally did not 
use single-letter names for any keywords or reserved words or system-defined 
entities etc, and all built-ins were either 2+ letters or were symbols.  As a 
result, single-letter names are available/reserved for end users as barewords to 
name their own (presumably narrow-lexical-scope) stuff, without having to guess 
which letters they may use. -- Darren Duncan

On 2017-09-22 8:05 AM, Murtuza Zabuawala wrote:
> The characters which are in purple colour are are valid SQL keywords hence
> highlighted by CodeMirror :-)
> Ref: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/sql-keywords-appendix.html
>
>     On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 1:53 PM, Hibbard, Brandon
>     wrote:
>
>         I have a quick question on the code highlighting.  I often use a single
>         character as an alias for tables in joins.  I have noticed that some
>         letters are colored purple while others are black.  Is there a reason
>         for this?  I have attached an image showing what I mean.  The image was
>         taken from version 2.0-rc2.



pgadmin-support by date:

Previous
From: "Hibbard, Brandon"
Date:
Subject: RE: purple letters
Next
From: Siddharth Divi
Date:
Subject: Inability to export data as '.csv' file in pgAdmin4