Re: parallel index creation: maintenance_work_mem not honored? - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Fabio Pardi
Subject Re: parallel index creation: maintenance_work_mem not honored?
Date
Msg-id f815f4b2-d49f-434b-b3de-d204605de49f@portavita.eu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: parallel index creation: maintenance_work_mem not honored?  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Responses Re: parallel index creation: maintenance_work_mem not honored?
List pgsql-admin
Thanks for the clarification Peter,

On 21/06/2022 08:46, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
>
>> But why the temp files are always on disk and not in RAM as other operations do?
> Why not?

Systems running on slow disks will probably suffer from workers writing temp files to disk.

> It is probably true that it would be better to use shared memory in
> the case where there is sufficient memory, but it's not all that
> significant compared to everything else that must happen at the same
> time. It's rarely the bottleneck. External sorts are often faster than
> internal sorts. That happens because they can be more CPU cache
> friendly, for reasons that aren't fundamental.
>


I would expect this behavior to be mentioned in the documentation.




regards,

fabio pardi



pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: "James Pang (chaolpan)"
Date:
Subject: RE: multiple sessions to create index in parallel support
Next
From: "James Pang (chaolpan)"
Date:
Subject: RE: multiple sessions to create index in parallel support