This was one of the threads, but the discussion is not the one that I am after.
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-advocacy/2008-01/msg00218.php
gb.-
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 2:29 AM, Guido Barosio <gbarosio@gmail.com> wrote:
> I was trying to find a thread where the discussion relied on the name,
> using PostgreSQL or just Postgres.
>
> AFAIK there was an agreement and PostgreSQL *won* that discussion, but
> I am unable to find that thread and I may be wrong. This comes to me
> because I was trying to push some *advocacy* stuff to the -es mailing
> list, and now I am not sure on how to proceeed.
>
> The case is that the .org FAQ explains that both names are just fine,
> and I am happy with that, but I seem to recall that PostgreSQL was the
> preferred option. Though, if this is the case we should change that
> from the site, right?
>
>
> --
> Guido Barosio
> -----------------------
> http://www.globant.com
> guido.barosio@globant.com
>
--
Guido Barosio
-----------------------
http://www.globant.com
guido.barosio@globant.com
