On 4/10/17 04:27, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> One thing to consider is that we just made the decision that "md5"
> actually means "md5 or scram-sha-256". Extrapolating from that, I think
> we'll want "scram-sha-256" to mean "scram-sha-256 or scram-sha-256-plus"
> (i.e. the channel-bonding variant) in the future. And if we get support
> for scram-sha-512, "scram-sha-256" would presumably allow that too.
But how would you choose between scram-sha-256-plus and scram-sha-512?
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services