Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Jeremy Schneider
Subject Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment
Date
Msg-id f780b8bc-a278-1e1f-f274-a9dbf1ab8912@amazon.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment  (Ron <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment  (Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas@visena.com>)
Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment  (Franck Pachot <pg.franck@pachot.net>)
List pgsql-general
> On 6/2/20 1:30 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
>> No, nothing does as PG doesn't support it as we have one WAL stream for
>> the entire cluster.

On 6/2/20 11:38, Ron wrote:
> Right.  Making WAL files specific to a database should be high on the
> list of priorities.

Did Oracle change this?  Last time I looked, I don't think Oracle
supported local redo in their multitenant architecture either.

-Jeremy


-- 
Jeremy Schneider
Database Engineer
Amazon Web Services



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Sonam Sharma
Date:
Subject: Shared memory error
Next
From: Andreas Joseph Krogh
Date:
Subject: Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment