> On 6/2/20 1:30 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
>> No, nothing does as PG doesn't support it as we have one WAL stream for
>> the entire cluster.
On 6/2/20 11:38, Ron wrote:
> Right. Making WAL files specific to a database should be high on the
> list of priorities.
Did Oracle change this? Last time I looked, I don't think Oracle
supported local redo in their multitenant architecture either.
Regardless of what Oracle does, I agree this would be a huge step in the right direction for pg-DBAs.
I have absolutely no clue about how much work is required etc., but I think it's kind of strange that no companies have invested in making this happen.
